Master Stephen Hwa “half body turning” at Fausts USA Karate, while Karate class stretches. Master Hwa taught Classical Tai Chi at Fausts.
YouTube video
Mr. E.H., commented on the YouTube video, essentially saying only his Wu Tai Chi is correct and all other styles, including other Wu are wrong:
"In Wu Tai Chi, the movement starts with the hand. The elbow follows the hand. Shoulder follows elbow. Hip follows shoulder. Foot follows hip. That is the way of natural movement. Chen's Style is wrong. Yang is wrong. Wu Style Tai Chi taught with hands following the feet is also wrong."
Sifu Jim Roach said: Sir, your statement is comparable to hitting a bell with a rather large stone and making a lengthy sound, so my response is appropriately enormous.
Thank you for the comment. I see that you are a student/teacher in a "branch" of the Wu Tai Chi style; I am as well. I was also a student in another "branch" for many years. I was in that branch for most of the 1990s, directly under Wu Kwong Yu (Eddie). Students are told to "turn the hip" instead of "turning the waist." However, they "start the movement with the hand" instead of "mobilizing the hands or other extremities from the waist."
One "branch" within the Wu Style also raises its arms very high above its head and starts such "hand movement"; Classical Wu Tai Chi does not do this. I will not argue the point from the perspective that one is right while the other is wrong; I would have my work cut out for me in doing so.
However, you imply that if something is natural, e.g., "natural movement," then it is somehow good, thus suggesting that what is unnatural, e.g., "unnatural movement," is terrible. This characterization of "natural" presents many problems. Even if we agree that some things are natural and some are not, what follows? Nothing.
In other words, I do not see facts presented to support that what is "natural" movement is good (right) and what is, by implication, "unnatural" is bad (wrong).
Do you state that "movement starting with the hand" is valid to the extent that all other schools are wrong? You say some schools, even within the same Style (Wu in this case), will start the "six harmonies" ( 1)hand follows 2) foot, 3) elbow follows 4) knee, 5) shoulder follows 6) hip by using the hand first. In this case, I see you are from the "Wu" school. You also do not mention using the core, the "hands" connection to the core, the feet, the elbows, etc.
Stating about the "six harmonies" being "wrong" as presented herein as Classical Wu Style is not sound. Simply stating the premise that "movement" is "wrong" because it is not "natural" does not make or present facts to make it "wrong."
There are, however, certain observable things that one can take note of: Here, in Classical Wu Tai Chi, the movement does not start with the hand; it begins with the waist. In using the hand to begin first, one uses an extremity of the body. Whether in Classical Tai Chi or any Tai Chi, it initially reduces or drains off some of the power of the movement, as the action is not connected to the core.
Tennis players, baseball players, golfers, etc., use an external action first with the arms/hands, then it is connected to the core, presumably for power, once the arc of the swing reaches the proximity of the core. However, using the hands/arms first does not mobilize the body's core effectively before the fact, for the core itself should be used to mobilize the hands, arms, and legs.
After all, we are talking about Tai Chi for health and martial purposes, not baseball. *Hand and arm movements in and of themselves are abstract; when not connected to the core of the body, they lack strength and cannot move in a relaxed manner. Excessive hand and arm movements in Tai Chi make hand and arm movements merely extraneous.
*Using the hand first and thus allowing the arms to move independently of the core, you compromise the movement and diffuse the neuromuscular signals for the body's core even to respond.
*Using the hand first, you place the junction for the delineation of yin and yang (what is moving/ what is not moving) somewhere in the area of the elbows or shoulder.
*Using the hand first creates a disconnect right where the shoulder meets the core.
*Using the hand first, you are short-circuiting and disrupting the flow of "qi," placing the disruption somewhere in the hand/elbow/shoulder…there is no circuit completion of qi flow through the core to the arm…It only begins in the core when the hand leads the arm, which engages and stretches the shoulder connected to the core.
In other words, it stops and then begins at the shoulder. Qi is also going where Yi goes. After a move from the core, however, the qi should flow to the arms and hands; most internal energy should continue circulating in the torso until needed.
*Using the hands first in Tai Chi sounds like how typists and piano players use their hands. As we said, this disrupts the flow of qi between the body and fingers. Using the core first ensures that the localized nerve activity of the hands/arms remains dormant and lets the qi from the body take over. This is a good reason to learn the square form of Classical Tai Chi so that a practitioner can get used to movements with steady arms and hands without localized nerve impulses.
Wu Chien Chuan himself told Yeung Wabu: "Every movement in Tai Chi Form has to have two complementary parts of the body, a moving (yang) part and a stationary part (yin). When the Yin-Yang junction is located in the torso of the body, it is an internal move. When it is outside the torso, it is an external move."
This is the key to a methodology that enables Tai Chi practitioners to mobilize the body's core for Tai Chi movements to generate internal energy and internal energy circulation. I have done Tai Chi from both sides of the coin, hand first, waist first, and the latter is the most powerful. Try using the waist first and keeping the hand still, and you will see the difference in power generation.